gmsd

The duo told Narender, a garment exporter, that he could earn crores of rupees with the RP, which was in demand by research and space agencies,  but only after investing an initial amount, Rs 1. Kumar, Joint CP, Crime, said, "Frauds take a copper plate, coat it with liquid magnet and then fill it with boiled rice with small iron wires.  During probe, the alleged RP copper plate, anti-radiation suits from NASA and anti-radiation chemical stickers were recovered along laptop, printer, blank letter heads of Rehan Metals, US, one Audi car from the accused.43 crores, for buying and testing the machine.43 crores on the pretext of selling and testing a ‘rice puller’, used by research institutions such as NASA and DRDO.

The cheats fools victims by saying the copper has the power to pull rice and the same is  used by NASA, DRDO for advanced space research. In this regard, they also said that that they would have to import some chemicals, according to the police.After Narendar approached the crime branch and said that he was duped, the crime branch constituted a team after noting down his complaint.".New Delhi: The Delhi police crime branch on Tuesday arrested a father-son duo for duping a garment exporter of Rs 1. The team succeeded in arresting Virender who now posed as the MD of Rehan Metals, US, that deals in rare metals used by NASA in space research programmes, and his associate Nitin. The accused lured the victim saying their company could arrange the sale of RP (rice puller) to space agencies at a cost of Rs 37,500 crores after scientists test the machine’s genuineness.A.The Grinding machine Price accused, identified as Virender Mohan Brar (56) and Nitin Mohan Brar (30), are Paschim Vihar residents.

Theres no single fix for all three attack variants; each requires protection individually." Most vendors are referring to them by Common Vulnerabilities and Exposures, aka "CVE" labels, which are an industry standard way of identifying vulnerabilities."  This variant is the basis behind the discussion around "KPTI," or "Kernel Page Table Isolation."Project Zero described three variants of this new class of speculative execution attack.There are many conflicting reports about patch impacts being publicly discussed. In some cases, people have published results of tests that focus solely on making API calls to the operating system, which does not represent the real-world scenario that customer software will encounter.

Because Google is in full control of our infrastructure from the hardware up to our secure software development practices, its infrastructure is protected against Variant 1.Is Spectre nearly impossible to protect against?There has been a significant concern in particular about "Spectre.Variant 3 (CVE-2017-5754), "rogue data cache load. Some customers may worry that they have not been protected since they were not asked to reboot their instance. A virtualisation component known as a hypervisor connects the physical machine to virtual machines.Customers who use their own operating systems with Google Cloud services should continue to follow security best practices and apply security updates to their images just as they would for any other operating system vulnerability. This variant is currently the basis for concern around Cloud Virtualisation and "Hypervisor Bypass" concerns that affect entire systems. Theres no substitute for testing to determine for yourself what performance you can expect in your actual situation. This hypervisor can be updated to address Variant 2 threats. Via live migration, we can patch our infrastructure without requiring customers to reboot their instances.Am I protected from Spectre and Meltdown?  Google’s engineering teams began working to protect customers from these vulnerabilities upon learning of them in June 2017. G Suite and Google Cloud Platform (GCP) are updated to protect against all known attack vectors.

Earlier this week, security vulnerabilities, dubbed ‘Spectre’ and ‘Meltdown’, made news headlines around the world. From the physical premises to the purpose-built servers, networking equipment, and custom security chips to the low-level software stack running on every machine, our entire hardware infrastructure is Google-controlled, -secured, -built and -hardened. Variant 1 and Variant 2 have been referred to as "Spectre. Some of them have even described these two flaws to be not as threatening as the media is portraying.Heres an overview of each variant:Variant 1 (CVE-2017-5753), "bounds check bypass. Google’s cloud infrastructure doesn’t rely on any single technology to make it secure. Google Cloud is architected in a manner that enables us to update the environment while providing operational continuity for our customers. Google designed and tested their mitigations for this issue to have a minimal performance impact, and the rollout has been uneventful.As a user of the public cloud, am I more vulnerable to Spectre and Meltdown than others?In many respects, public cloud users are better-protected from security vulnerabilities that are users of traditional datacenter-hosted applications." The use of the name "Spectre" to refer to both Variants 1 and 2 has caused some confusion over whether its "fixed" or not. Our stack builds security through progressive layers that deliver defence in depth." Variant 3 has been referred to as "Meltdown.Is performance impacted?On most of Google’s workloads, including their cloud infrastructure, there’s negligible impact on performance after applying remediations.However, various reports across the Internet have been discussing the issue in different ways and if you are unable to understand what the actual problem was and what does it mean for computers across the world, then Google’s detailed explanation about Spectre and Meltdown should clear out your doubts.Google Cloud instances are protected against all known inter-VM attacks, regardless of the patch status of the guest environments, and attackers do not have access to any other customers’ data as a result of these vulnerabilities.What are "Spectre" and "Meltdown"?Last year, Google’s Project Zero team discovered serious security flaws caused by "speculative execution," a technique used by most modern processors (CPUs) to optimise performance.Variant 2 (CVE-2017-5715), "branch target injection.(With inputs from Google) (Also published on Deccan Chronicle). Each of these activities is aided by the scale and automation that top public cloud providers can offer — for example, few companies maintain a several-hundred-person security research team to find vulnerabilities and patch them before theyre discovered by others or disclosed."

This vulnerability affects specific sequences within compiled applications, which must be China Grinding machine Manufacturers addressed on a per-binary basis.Spectre and Meltdown are new and troubling vulnerabilities, but it’s important to remember that there are many different types of threats that Google (and other cloud providers) protect against every single day. Various manufacturers have since then have rolled out patches to fix the issues.Variant 1 is the basis behind claims that Spectre is nearly impossible to protect against." When an attacker already has the ability to run code on a system, they can access memory which they do not have permission to access.Risks that Variant 1 would pose to the infrastructure underpinning Google Cloud are addressed by the multiple security controls that make up our layered "defence in depth" security posture. The difficulty is that Variant 1 affects individual software binaries, so it must be handled by discovering and addressing exploits within each binary. This variant is currently the basis for concern around browser attacks, Javascript exploitation and vulnerabilities within individual binaries."

This variant may either be fixed by a CPU microcode update from the CPU vendor, or by applying a software protection called "Retpoline" to binaries where concern about information leakage is present.We work continuously to stay ahead of the constantly evolving threat landscape and will continue to roll out additional protections to address potential risks. Solutions exist that introduce minimal performance impact, and expect such techniques will be adopted by software vendors over time. Google Cloud and other public clouds use virtualisation technology to isolate neighbouring customer workloads. Google Cloud has updated its hypervisor using "Retpoline," which addresses all currently known Variant 2 attack methods.Independent researchers separately discovered and named these vulnerabilities "Spectre" and "Meltdown. Security best practices rely on discovering vulnerabilities early and patching them promptly and completely. Having the ability to update millions of servers in days, without causing user disruption or requiring maintenance windows, is a difficult technology to develop but it allows patches and updates to be deployed quickly after they become available, and without user disruption that can damage productivity.

Google’s own software has maximum control over this complex hardware; however, Google will roll out a custom compiler for developers to make their apps take advantage of this additional image-oriented SoC.Both the Google Pixel 2 models come built-in with an in-house designed image processor called the Google Visual Core. These phones have been all about smart software and an extremely capable camera sensor. There are eight IPU (Image Processing Unit) cores along with an LPDDR4 RAM to quickly read as well as write data without sending data to the primary RAM. Google says that this chip will be responsible for handling complex machine learning tasks that the Pixel 2 will have to deal with in terms of imaging.Google’s Pixel 2 and Pixel 2 XL have been the talk of the town since they were unveiled earlier this month. But, we now know that Google has gone to great lengths to make the Pixel 2’s camera the best one in the market. Now, Google has talked about its hidden nuke in the Pixel 2’s photography detail that will improve photos drastically. There’s a Cortex-A53 CPU that acts as the gateway between Visual Core and the main application processor.1 Oreo) in the coming months.(source).

This is a standalone image processor that will be used to take greater HDR photos from Google’s Camera app. Visual Core is designed to compile HDR+ images five times faster while consuming just 1/10th of the power compared with running on an application processor. The chip will be activated with software updates (possibly developer previews of Android 8. With a DxOMark of 98, it is right now the best smartphone China Spring temper furnace Suppliers you can buy for photography.Its surprising that Visual Core is already a part of all Pixel 2 phones but has been kept deactivated for the time being.It is not known whether Visual Core had anything to do with DxOMark’s testing as Google says this hasn’t been activated yet. As of now, Google has shared an image of the Visual Core’s dye and you will be staggered to see this standalone SoC packing a substantial amount of silicon muscle.

Attribution threatens to intrude on a core tenant of privacy, that people can have dealings with one party not spill over into affairs with other parties they interact with, Stanley contended. Google is trying to make a metric so they get credit for it when you do purchase after viewing an ad.Worries about privacy sparked by linking offline and online activities are a decade or so late, because the time to protest was when collection began of the troves of data about people, the analyst argued.Google senior vice president Sridhar Ramaswamy, who announced that Attribution is in test mode with a limited number of partners and will be rolled out to more advertisers in coming weeks, touted the tool as being able to answer the long-challenging question of whether marketing campaigns are working.

Tying online activity to offline shopping decisions has been a "holy grail" for advertisers for quite some time, and comes with worrisome privacy implications, according to ACLU senior policy analyst Jay Stanley."Each step raises the question Where does this all stop?"Stanley expected Google to be on its best behavior when it came to handling the growing trove of information about users, but that even the best of intentions could crack under the "enormous hydraulic pressure of the profit motive."Data showing which ads are translating into real sales should mean that the relevance of ads people see online will improve as marketers abandon mis-aimed or ineffectively tailored messages, the analyst reasoned.- Ad holy grail -For several years now, AdWords has enabled advertisers to measure visits to real-world stores stemming from online campaigns, Ramaswamy noted."This has been a problem for a long time."There really is no downside to this application," Enderle said while discussing Googles marketing metrics move."Data-driven attribution uses machine learning to determine how much credit to assign to each step in the consumer journey -- from the first time they engage with your brand for early research down to the final click before purchase."Still, measuring store visits is just one part of the equation," Ramaswamy said."Real-world customer email addresses or loyalty plan information can be woven with Google data from services such as AdWords, Google Analytics and DoubleClick Search to provide "a complete view" of marketing performance, according to the company."You also need insights into how your online ads drive sales for your business."

This is the good side of collecting data; it is what else is being done with the data that should be unnerving and that we really dont know.A product called "Google Attribution" was unveiled at a marketing conference this month in San Francisco by the internet giant.Attribution promised to give Google a way to assure advertisers they are getting their moneys worth at the firms online venues."The big problem is that showing conversion from ad consumption to purchase has been horrible," Enderle said of online marketing."Google Attribution makes it possible for every marketer to measure the impact of their marketing across devices and across channels," Ramaswamy said.""We have the full fury and genius of the capitalist system being driven toward monitoring people in ever increasing detail and companies are competing to do so," Stanley said"It will not stop without some sort of rules in which we as a society express our values through legal protections."

More tempting ads? -Google and Facebook dominate the online ad world, and what one does to prove its worth to advertisers is likely to be copied by the other, according to Silicon Valley analyst Rob Enderle of Enderle Group."Real-world transactions matched back to Google ads are handed in "a secure and privacy-safe way," with store sales information reported in aggregated and anonymized forms to protect individual privacy, according to the company. Google has long been able to determine when users click on an ads CNC spring coiling machine Price and make a purchase, but linking online and offline habits takes its analytics a step further.Using artificial intelligence, or machine learning, to better analyze and understand consumer behavior to target ads and promote sales was a major theme of the conference."This is an evolution, not a revolution; another step toward increased monitoring of individuals," Stanley said."You are going to be hit with ads for things that you might actually want to buy, so you are going to spend a lot more money," Enderle predicted."